Industry · LegalTech
AI Solutions for Legal and LegalTech
Contract analysis and bilingual research assistants with citations to source.
Overview
Legal work is reading, comparing and drafting at volume, which makes it an obvious fit for language models and an unforgiving one. An answer without a verifiable source is not usable, and a confident wrong answer is worse than no answer.
We build legal assistants and contract systems where every response cites the passage it came from, so a lawyer can verify in seconds rather than re-reading the document. Retrieval runs over your own precedent bank, matter files and playbooks, with matter-level permissions enforced so the assistant never surfaces material a user could not open directly.
We have shipped bilingual assistants where the source law and the working language differ, which is a retrieval and terminology problem before it is a translation one.
Where AI pays off in Legal Technology
Contract review and clause extraction
Deviation flagging against your playbook, with the offending clause and the standard position side by side.
Legal research assistants
Grounded answers over statute, case law and internal precedent, every claim linked to its source passage.
Bilingual document workflows
Cross-language retrieval and drafting where the governing text and the working language differ.
Drafting and matter intake
First-draft generation from precedent, and triage that routes incoming matters to the right team.
What we design around
Legal Technology constraints
- Citations mandatory on every generated answer
- Matter-level permissions and confidentiality walls
- Privilege preservation and retention rules
- Terminology consistency across languages and jurisdictions
Services we apply here
How we build for Legal Technology
Proof in production
Related case studies
Frequently asked
Legal Technology: common questions
How do you stop a legal assistant from inventing authority?
Answers are generated only from retrieved passages and must carry a citation. Unsupported statements are visible immediately, and the system is scored against a fixed question set with known answers before release.
Can it respect confidentiality walls between matters?
Yes. Retrieval applies the same permissions as your document management system, so a user only ever sees results from material they can already access.
Does it work across two languages?
Yes. We have built assistants that retrieve from source-language legal text and answer in the user's working language, with a maintained terminology glossary to keep translations consistent.
Let’s solve your data challenge